lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 17:36:27 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the akpm-current tree On Sat, 9 May 2020 10:19:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi all, > > Commits > > a41ffad2df78 ("mm: free_area_init: allow defining max_zone_pfn in descending order") Look OK to me? https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-free_area_init-allow-defining-max_zone_pfn-in-descending-order.patch > ed1e07587fb4 ("mm/gup.c: further document vma_permits_fault()") Yeah, I wasn't sent a signoff. Miles, please send? > da5d272cd01a ("checkpatch: test $GIT_DIR changes") Yup, that's a play patch which I'm supposed to test. > are missing a Signed-off-by from their authors (I haven't reported the > -fix patches). > > I guess the first one is actually a fix patch and will be rolled into > its parent. > > Also, the Link tag in this last one is invalid :-( Private email ;). If my testing is successful I guess we'll get a real version of this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists