linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the akpm-current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 17:36:27 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the
 akpm-current tree

On Sat, 9 May 2020 10:19:19 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Commits
> 
>   a41ffad2df78 ("mm: free_area_init: allow defining max_zone_pfn in descending order")

Look OK to me?

https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-free_area_init-allow-defining-max_zone_pfn-in-descending-order.patch

>   ed1e07587fb4 ("mm/gup.c: further document vma_permits_fault()")

Yeah, I wasn't sent a signoff.  Miles, please send?

>   da5d272cd01a ("checkpatch: test $GIT_DIR changes")

Yup, that's a play patch which I'm supposed to test.

> are missing a Signed-off-by from their authors (I haven't reported the
> -fix patches).
> 
> I guess the first one is actually a fix patch and will be rolled into
> its parent.
> 
> Also, the Link tag in this last one is invalid :-(

Private email ;).  If my testing is successful I guess we'll get a real
version of this.