lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 9 May 2020 08:47:24 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        laurentiu.tudor@....com, bharatb.linux@...il.com,
        Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
        Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] vfio/fsl-mc: Add read/write support for fsl-mc
 devices

Hi Diana,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on vfio/next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.7-rc4 next-20200508]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Diana-Craciun/vfio-fsl-mc-VFIO-support-for-FSL-MC-devices/20200509-034845
base:   https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio.git next
config: i386-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c: In function 'vfio_fsl_mc_release':
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:170:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'dprc_reset_container'; did you mean 'resource_contains'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      ret = dprc_reset_container(mc_cont->mc_io, 0,
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            resource_contains
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:173:6: error: 'DPRC_RESET_OPTION_NON_RECURSIVE' undeclared (first use in this function)
         DPRC_RESET_OPTION_NON_RECURSIVE);
         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:173:6: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:177:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'fsl_mc_cleanup_irq_pool'; did you mean 'fsl_mc_free_irqs'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      fsl_mc_cleanup_irq_pool(mc_cont);
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      fsl_mc_free_irqs
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c: In function 'vfio_fsl_mc_read':
>> drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:348:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      data[i] = readq(region->ioaddr + i * sizeof(uint64_t));
                ^~~~~
                readl
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c: In function 'vfio_fsl_mc_send_command':
>> drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:367:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq_relaxed'; did you mean 'writeb_relaxed'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      writeq_relaxed(cmd_data[i], ioaddr + i * sizeof(uint64_t));
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      writeb_relaxed
>> drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:370:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writel'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     writeq(cmd_data[0], ioaddr);
     ^~~~~~
     writel
   In file included from include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:5:0,
                    from arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:5,
                    from include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h:6,
                    from arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:395,
                    from include/linux/bitops.h:29,
                    from include/linux/kernel.h:12,
                    from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:45,
                    from arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:6,
                    from include/linux/sched.h:12,
                    from include/linux/ratelimit.h:6,
                    from include/linux/dev_printk.h:16,
                    from include/linux/device.h:15,
                    from drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:7:
>> drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:380:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq_relaxed'; did you mean 'readw_relaxed'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      header = cpu_to_le64(readq_relaxed(ioaddr));
                           ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:31:51: note: in definition of macro '__cpu_to_le64'
    #define __cpu_to_le64(x) ((__force __le64)(__u64)(x))
                                                      ^
>> drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:380:12: note: in expansion of macro 'cpu_to_le64'
      header = cpu_to_le64(readq_relaxed(ioaddr));
               ^~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c: In function 'vfio_fsl_mc_bus_notifier':
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:517:9: error: 'struct fsl_mc_device' has no member named 'driver_override'
      mc_dev->driver_override = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s",
            ^~
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c: In function 'vfio_fsl_mc_init_device':
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:555:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'dprc_setup'; did you mean 'x2apic_setup'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     ret = dprc_setup(mc_dev);
           ^~~~~~~~~~
           x2apic_setup
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:562:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'dprc_scan_container'; did you mean 'init_section_contains'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     ret = dprc_scan_container(mc_dev, false);
           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
           init_section_contains
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:566:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'dprc_cleanup'; did you mean 'pud_clear'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      dprc_cleanup(mc_dev);
      ^~~~~~~~~~~~
      pud_clear
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c: In function 'vfio_fsl_mc_device_remove':
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:625:14: error: 'struct fsl_mc_device' has no member named 'driver_override'
     kfree(mc_dev->driver_override);
                 ^~
   drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:626:8: error: 'struct fsl_mc_device' has no member named 'driver_override'
     mc_dev->driver_override = NULL;
           ^~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +348 drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c

   314	
   315	static ssize_t vfio_fsl_mc_read(void *device_data, char __user *buf,
   316					size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
   317	{
   318		struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev = device_data;
   319		unsigned int index = VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_TO_INDEX(*ppos);
   320		loff_t off = *ppos & VFIO_FSL_MC_OFFSET_MASK;
   321		struct vfio_fsl_mc_region *region;
   322		u64 data[8];
   323		int i;
   324	
   325		/* Read ioctl supported only for DPRC and DPMCP device */
   326		if (strcmp(vdev->mc_dev->obj_desc.type, "dprc") &&
   327		    strcmp(vdev->mc_dev->obj_desc.type, "dpmcp"))
   328			return -EINVAL;
   329	
   330		if (index >= vdev->num_regions)
   331			return -EINVAL;
   332	
   333		region = &vdev->regions[index];
   334	
   335		if (!(region->flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_READ))
   336			return -EINVAL;
   337	
   338		if (!region->ioaddr) {
   339			region->ioaddr = ioremap(region->addr, region->size);
   340			if (!region->ioaddr)
   341				return -ENOMEM;
   342		}
   343	
   344		if (count != 64 || off != 0)
   345			return -EINVAL;
   346	
   347		for (i = 7; i >= 0; i--)
 > 348			data[i] = readq(region->ioaddr + i * sizeof(uint64_t));
   349	
   350		if (copy_to_user(buf, data, 64))
   351			return -EFAULT;
   352	
   353		return count;
   354	}
   355	
   356	#define MC_CMD_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_MS    5000
   357	#define MC_CMD_COMPLETION_POLLING_MAX_SLEEP_USECS    500
   358	
   359	static int vfio_fsl_mc_send_command(void __iomem *ioaddr, uint64_t *cmd_data)
   360	{
   361		int i;
   362		enum mc_cmd_status status;
   363		unsigned long timeout_usecs = MC_CMD_COMPLETION_TIMEOUT_MS * 1000;
   364	
   365		/* Write at command parameter into portal */
   366		for (i = 7; i >= 1; i--)
 > 367			writeq_relaxed(cmd_data[i], ioaddr + i * sizeof(uint64_t));
   368	
   369		/* Write command header in the end */
 > 370		writeq(cmd_data[0], ioaddr);
   371	
   372		/* Wait for response before returning to user-space
   373		 * This can be optimized in future to even prepare response
   374		 * before returning to user-space and avoid read ioctl.
   375		 */
   376		for (;;) {
   377			u64 header;
   378			struct mc_cmd_header *resp_hdr;
   379	
 > 380			header = cpu_to_le64(readq_relaxed(ioaddr));
   381	
   382			resp_hdr = (struct mc_cmd_header *)&header;
   383			status = (enum mc_cmd_status)resp_hdr->status;
   384			if (status != MC_CMD_STATUS_READY)
   385				break;
   386	
   387			udelay(MC_CMD_COMPLETION_POLLING_MAX_SLEEP_USECS);
   388			timeout_usecs -= MC_CMD_COMPLETION_POLLING_MAX_SLEEP_USECS;
   389			if (timeout_usecs == 0)
   390				return -ETIMEDOUT;
   391		}
   392	
   393		return 0;
   394	}
   395	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (71319 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists