linux-kernel - Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mvpp2: cls: Use RSS contexts to handle RSS tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200509124843.GC1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Sat, 9 May 2020 13:48:43 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Stefan Chulski <stefanc@...vell.com>,
        Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        "gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        "miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mvpp2: cls: Use RSS contexts
 to handle RSS tables

On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:16:44PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, 9 May 2020 12:45:18 +0100
> Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > Looking at the timeline here, it looks like Matteo raised the issue
> > very quickly after the patch was sent on the 14th April, and despite
> > following up on it, despite me following up on it, bootlin have
> > remained quiet.
> 
> Unfortunately, we are no longer actively working on Marvell platform
> support at the moment. We might have a look on a best effort basis, but
> this is potentially a non-trivial issue, so I'm not sure when we will
> have the chance to investigate and fix this.

That may be the case, but that doesn't excuse the fact that we have a
regression and we need to do something.

Please can you suggest how we resolve this regression prior to
5.7-final?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up