linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rx0 mipi-phy for rk3399

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9fdceef69a390235225a8fd08f89f67be9c5c920.camel@collabora.com>
Date:   Sat, 09 May 2020 09:53:53 -0300
From:   Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
To:     Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
        kernel@...labora.com, dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, karthik.poduval@...il.com, jbx6244@...il.com,
        kishon@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rx0 mipi-phy for rk3399

Hi Heiko,

On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 13:15 -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
> From: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@...k-chips.com>
> 
> Designware MIPI D-PHY, used for ISP0 in rk3399.
> 
> Verified with:
> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip-mipi-dphy-rx0.yaml
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@...k-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Chen <jacob2.chen@...k-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - fix alignment of clocks
> 
> V1:
> This patchset came from the original ISP series from Rockchip:
> 
>     https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10267409/
> 

Can you take the devicetree changes (patches 8 and 9) ?

Thanks,
Ezequiel

> The only difference is:
> - add phy-cells
> - update compatible to "rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dphy-rx0"
> - commit message
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> index 33cc21fcf4c10..6b3380b10e596 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> @@ -1394,6 +1394,17 @@ io_domains: io-domains {
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> +		mipi_dphy_rx0: mipi-dphy-rx0 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-mipi-dphy-rx0";
> +			clocks = <&cru SCLK_MIPIDPHY_REF>,
> +				 <&cru SCLK_DPHY_RX0_CFG>,
> +				 <&cru PCLK_VIO_GRF>;
> +			clock-names = "dphy-ref", "dphy-cfg", "grf";
> +			power-domains = <&power RK3399_PD_VIO>;
> +			#phy-cells = <0>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +
>  		u2phy0: usb2-phy@...0 {
>  			compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-usb2phy";
>  			reg = <0xe450 0x10>;
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 
>