lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ABC2D7EE-2C59-4A96-A105-406F424A93AD@lca.pw>
Date:   Sat, 9 May 2020 11:37:15 -0400
From:   Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To:     Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: ioremap() called early from pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb()



> On May 9, 2020, at 4:38 AM, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> Your patch to use early_ioremap is faulting? I wonder why?

Yes, I don’t know the reasons either. I suppose not many places in other parts of the kernel which keep using those addresses from early_ioremap() after system booted. Otherwise, we would see those leak warnings elsewhere.

Thus, we probably have to audit the code, and if still necessary, call early_ioremap() and then early_iounmap() followed by a ioremap() once slab allocator is available?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ