[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVSNPQesBfuKVwZkQXTF-Q-p4s6jH8ocr0RKRErERRzMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 12:08:38 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 1 02/36] x86/hw_breakpoint: Prevent data
breakpoints on cpu_entry_area
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 2:23 AM Lai Jiangshan
<jiangshanlai+lkml@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:15 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> >
> > A data breakpoint near the top of an IST stack will cause unresoverable
> > recursion. A data breakpoint on the GDT, IDT, or TSS is terrifying.
> > Prevent either of these from happening.
> >
>
> What happen when a data breakpoint on the direct GDT (load_direct_gdt())
> and the debug IDT (load_debug_idt()) which are not considered in this patch?
>
I have no idea, and learning the answer may involve talking to the
respective CPU vendors' microcode engineers. We should probably block
those, too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists