lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 9 May 2020 16:26:53 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RISC-V Fixes for 5.7-rc5

On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 11:47 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> * Adding a note to the VDSO so glibc can check the kernel's version without a
>   uname().

Eww.

I realize other architectures do this, but why add it to new architectures?

glibc depending on kernel version is WRONG. It's bogus. You can't do
feature detection based on kernel version, it's fundamentally broken.

So I really would prefer to see glibc fixed not to do that stupid
thing, instead of adding pointless vdso notes to the kernel.

Andreas? Why does glibc care about that ELF note?

              Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists