[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb46eb601f979d5d8d95ec5749ae06c1bc86d469.camel@mellanox.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 23:43:08 +0000
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
"gustavoars@...nel.org" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 16:36 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2020 13:59:35 -0500 Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to
> > declare
> > variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
> > member[1][2],
> > introduced in C99:
> >
> > struct foo {
> > int stuff;
> > struct boo array[];
> > };
>
> Saeed, I'm expecting you to take this and the mlx4 patch via your
> trees.
Yes for the mlx5 patch, but usually Dave takes mlx4 patches directly.
since the volume of mlx4 patches is very small, let's apply them
directly to net-next, unless you want me to handle them from now on and
make your life easier, then i don't have any issue with that.
Saeed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists