[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW7dNE2eoYANRjkRMzdXDh0jDD=cDT4WaKhQKsxYkkb4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 17:11:47 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 2 12/18] x86,objtool: Make entry_64_compat.S
objtool clean
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 7:14 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> Currently entry_64_compat is exempt from objtool, but with vmlinux
> mode there is no hiding it.
>
> Make the following changes to make it pass:
>
> - change entry_SYSENTER_compat to STT_NOTYPE; it's not a function
> and doesn't have function type stack setup.
>
> - mark all STT_NOTYPE symbols with UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY; so we do
> validate them and don't treat them as unreachable.
>
> - don't abuse RSP as a temp register, this confuses objtool
> mightily as it (rightfully) thinks we're doing unspeakable
> things to the stack.
>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Did a From line get eaten?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists