lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 9 May 2020 08:13:00 +0530
From:   Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>
To:     Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
        hpa@...or.com, sudeep.holla@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, mcgrof@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        yzaikin@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com, tkjos@...gle.com,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] sched: cpufreq: Use IS_ENABLED() for schedutil

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:21:29PM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Friday 08 May 2020 at 11:00:53 (+0530), Pavan Kondeti wrote:
> > > -#if defined(CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL)
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL)
> > >  	/* Build perf. domains: */
> > >  	for (i = 0; i < ndoms_new; i++) {
> > >  		for (j = 0; j < n && !sched_energy_update; j++) {
> > 
> > Now that scheduler does not have any references to schedutil_gov and cpufreq
> > has want_eas flag, do we need this CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL checks here?
> 
> Right, they're not absolutely required, but given that sugov is the only
> one to have 'want_eas' set I guess there is no need to compile that in
> without it, no?
> 
Right.

Since you removed all compile time dependencies on schedutil, I thought the
#ifdef check around schedutil can be removed too. 

Thanks,
Pavan

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists