[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e097eb0-6132-f549-8069-d13b678183f5@pensando.io>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 18:01:51 -0700
From: Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, jeyu@...nel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arnd@...db.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com, aquini@...hat.com, cai@....pw, dyoung@...hat.com,
bhe@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
gpiccoli@...onical.com, pmladek@...e.com, tiwai@...e.de,
schlad@...e.de, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
keescook@...omium.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, will@...nel.org,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] net: taint when the device driver firmware crashes
On 5/8/20 9:35 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Device driver firmware can crash, and sometimes, this can leave your
> system in a state which makes the device or subsystem completely
> useless. Detecting this by inspecting /proc/sys/kernel/tainted instead
> of scraping some magical words from the kernel log, which is driver
> specific, is much easier. So instead this series provides a helper which
> lets drivers annotate this and shows how to use this on networking
> drivers.
>
If the driver is able to detect that the device firmware has come back
alive, through user intervention or whatever, should there be a way to
"untaint" the kernel? Or would you expect it to remain tainted?
sln
Powered by blists - more mailing lists