lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 07:16:30 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, ashok.raj@...el.com,
        jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
        Derrick Jonathan <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
        Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Replace private domain with per-group default
 domain

Hi Joerg,

On 5/6/20 9:59 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Some devices are required to use a specific type (identity or dma) of
> default domain when they are used with a vendor iommu. When the system
> level default domain type is different from it, the vendor iommu driver
> has to request a new default domain with either
> iommu_request_dma_domain_for_dev() or iommu_request_dm_for_dev() in the
> add_dev() callback. Unfortunately, these two helpers only work when the
> group hasn't been assigned to any other devices, hence, some vendor iommu
> driver has to use a private domain if it fails to request a new default
> one.
> 
> Joerg proposed an on-going proposal which makes the default domain
> framework to support configuring per-group default domain during boot
> process.
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/14/616
> [This has been applied in iommu/next.]
> 
> Hence, there is no need to keep the private domain implementation
> in the Intel IOMMU driver. This patch series aims to remove it.

Can you please take this series to iommu/next for wider test?

Best regards,
baolu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists