linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in recipes.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5014c7f8-3a0b-e364-4c7a-bb03976e569f@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 May 2020 16:23:12 +0900
From:   Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vpillai@...italocean.com,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in
 recipes.txt

>From c171026a697d401ea5d2ad6656d0481944604b14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 13:37:14 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] tools/memory-model: Fix reference to litmus test in recipes.txt

The name of litmus test doesn't match the one described below.
Fix the name of litmus test.

Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
---
 tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
index 7fe8d7aa3029..63c4adfed884 100644
--- a/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
+++ b/tools/memory-model/Documentation/recipes.txt
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ However, it is not necessarily the case that accesses ordered by
 locking will be seen as ordered by CPUs not holding that lock.
 Consider this example:
 
-	/* See Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus. */
+	/* See Z6.0+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus. */
 	void CPU0(void)
 	{
 		spin_lock(&mylock);
-- 
2.17.1