[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200511172620.GA14618@embeddedor>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:26:20 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf script: Replace zero-length array with
flexible-array
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:48:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:06:15PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva escreveu:
> > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> > variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> > introduced in C99:
> >
> > struct foo {
> > int stuff;
> > struct boo array[];
> > };
>
> Can you split this into a kernel part and tools/ one? Also this is not
> really just for "perf script", so please adjust the subject line too :-)
>
Sure thing. :)
Is that OK if I use "perf: " for the tools part and "perf/x86: " for the
kernel part?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists