[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200511183155.GT11244@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 18:31:55 +0000
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Ivan Teterevkov <ivan.teterevkov@...anix.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...onical.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] lib/test_sysctl: support testing of sysctl. boot
parameter
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:05:22PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> On 4/27/20 8:39 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 08:04:33PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Nice, also we could just require
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config
> > index 6ca14800d755..34461cc99a2b 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config
> > @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> > CONFIG_TEST_SYSCTL=y
> > +CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y
> > +CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y
> >
> > tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_lib.sh then has a kconfig_has()
> > which can verify the exact config.
>
> Hmm but it also has a (firmware area specific) fallback for case where
> IKCONFIG_PROC doesn't exist. So it's simpler to just keep checking the module
> dir, IMHO, as that would be the fallback.
As you wish.
> >> +
> >> + echo -n "Testing if $TARGET is set to 1 ..."
> >> + ORIG=$(cat "${TARGET}")
> >
> > This would fail if someone uses this script to test an older kernel, and
> > the scripts in selftests are supposed to work with older kernels.
>
> Oh, I didn't know that it's supposed to.
Yeap, that's how they are used.
> > One
> > way to address this would be to just see if the file exists first and
> > ignore the test if the $SYSCTL directory exists but the file $TARGET
> > does not.
> >
> > For now we can just do this:
> >
> > if [ ! -d $TARGET ]; then
> > echo "Skipping test for $TARGET as it is not present ..."
> > return 0
> > fi
>
> OK, just the -d test needs to be fixed :) Andrew can you please apply:
>
> ----8<----
> From a999e993a89e521b152bbd4b1466f69e62879c30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:59:49 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] lib/test_sysctl: support testing of sysctl. boot parameter -
> fix
>
> Skip the new test if boot_int sysctl is not present, otherwise, per Luis,
> "This would fail if someone uses this script to test an older kernel, and
> the scripts in selftests are supposed to work with older kernels."
>
> Suggested-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> index ef6417b8067b..148704f465b5 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> @@ -756,6 +756,11 @@ sysctl_test_0006()
You want to:
# Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4.
ksft_skip=4
> sysctl_test_0007()
> {
> TARGET="${SYSCTL}/boot_int"
> + if [ ! -f $TARGET ]; then
> + echo "Skipping test for $TARGET as it is not present ..."
> + return 0
> + fi
And return 4 instead.
Luis
> +
> if [ -d $DIR ]; then
> echo "Boot param test only possible sysctl_test is built-in, not module:"
> cat $TEST_DIR/config >&2
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists