[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200511183645.GA596850@rani.riverdale.lan>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 14:36:45 -0400
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To: Mike Lothian <mike@...eburn.co.uk>
Cc: nivedita@...m.mit.edu, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] efi/x86: Remove extra headroom for setup block
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:01:49PM +0100, Mike Lothian wrote:
> Hi
>
> This patch has been causing issues for me since switching to GCC 10.1:
>
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> DESCEND objtool
> CHK include/generated/compile.h
> HOSTCC arch/x86/boot/tools/build
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/10.1.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: error: linker defined: multiple definition of '_end'
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/10.1.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /tmp/ccEkW0jM.o: previous definition here
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.host:103: arch/x86/boot/tools/build] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/x86/Makefile:303: bzImage] Error 2
>
> Cheers
>
> Mike
I'm not getting an error even with gcc 10 for some reason, but I can see
that it is busted. It's using the linker-defined _end symbol which is
just pass the end of the .bss.
Does adding "static" to the declaration of _end fix your error?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists