linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 23/75] x86/boot/compressed/64: Setup GHCB Based VC Exception handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200511200709.GE25861@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 22:07:09 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Cfir Cohen <cfir@...gle.com>,
        Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/75] x86/boot/compressed/64: Setup GHCB Based VC
 Exception handler

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:33PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> @@ -63,3 +175,45 @@ void __init do_vc_no_ghcb(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long exit_code)
>  	while (true)
>  		asm volatile("hlt\n");
>  }
> +
> +static enum es_result vc_insn_string_read(struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt,
> +					  void *src, char *buf,
> +					  unsigned int data_size,
> +					  unsigned int count,
> +					  bool backwards)
> +{
> +	int i, b = backwards ? -1 : 1;
> +	enum es_result ret = ES_OK;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		void *s = src + (i * data_size * b);
> +		char *d = buf + (i * data_size);

>From a previous review:

Where are we checking whether that count is not exceeding @buf or
similar discrepancies?

Ditto below.

> +
> +		ret = vc_read_mem(ctxt, s, d, data_size);
> +		if (ret != ES_OK)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static enum es_result vc_insn_string_write(struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt,
> +					   void *dst, char *buf,
> +					   unsigned int data_size,
> +					   unsigned int count,
> +					   bool backwards)
> +{
> +	int i, s = backwards ? -1 : 1;
> +	enum es_result ret = ES_OK;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		void *d = dst + (i * data_size * s);
> +		char *b = buf + (i * data_size);
> +
> +		ret = vc_write_mem(ctxt, d, b, data_size);
> +		if (ret != ES_OK)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette