linux-kernel - [tip: core/rcu] rcu: Mark rcu_state.gp_seq to detect more concurrent writes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <158923078266.390.7799718018876713808.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 20:59:42 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Paul E. McKenney" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: core/rcu] rcu: Mark rcu_state.gp_seq to detect more concurrent writes

The following commit has been merged into the core/rcu branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     62ae19511f1efbe9f57346ca1f45e13b061a56ff
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/62ae19511f1efbe9f57346ca1f45e13b061a56ff
Author:        Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
AuthorDate:    Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:52:20 -07:00
Committer:     Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:01:16 -07:00

rcu: Mark rcu_state.gp_seq to detect more concurrent writes

The rcu_state structure's gp_seq field is only to be modified by the RCU
grace-period kthread, which is single-threaded.  This commit therefore
enlists KCSAN's help in enforcing this restriction.  This commit applies
KCSAN-specific primitives, so cannot go upstream until KCSAN does.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 0132bc6..183b9cf 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp_start, struct rcu_data *rdp,
 		trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("NoGPkthread"));
 		goto unlock_out;
 	}
-	trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rcu_state.gp_seq, TPS("newreq"));
+	trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, data_race(rcu_state.gp_seq), TPS("newreq"));
 	ret = true;  /* Caller must wake GP kthread. */
 unlock_out:
 	/* Push furthest requested GP to leaf node and rcu_data structure. */
@@ -1519,6 +1519,7 @@ static bool rcu_gp_init(void)
 	record_gp_stall_check_time();
 	/* Record GP times before starting GP, hence rcu_seq_start(). */
 	rcu_seq_start(&rcu_state.gp_seq);
+	ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(rcu_state.gp_seq);
 	trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rcu_state.gp_seq, TPS("start"));
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
 
@@ -1805,6 +1806,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_cleanup(void)
 	/* Declare grace period done, trace first to use old GP number. */
 	trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rcu_state.gp_seq, TPS("end"));
 	rcu_seq_end(&rcu_state.gp_seq);
+	ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(rcu_state.gp_seq);
 	rcu_state.gp_state = RCU_GP_IDLE;
 	/* Check for GP requests since above loop. */
 	rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);