linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] perf c2c: fix '-e list'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200511210843.GG2986380@krava>
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 23:08:43 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf c2c: fix '-e list'

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:29:42PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:

SNIP

> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c b/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c
> > > index 1baf4cae086f..d617d5682c68 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c
> > > @@ -2887,8 +2887,15 @@ static int parse_record_events(const struct option *opt,
> > >  {
> > >       bool *event_set = (bool *) opt->value;
> > >
> > > +     if (!strcmp(str, "list")) {
> > > +             perf_mem_events__list();
> > > +             exit(0);
> > > +     }
> > > +     if (perf_mem_events__parse(str))
> > > +             exit(-1);
> >
> > won't this exit(-1) callsbreak the parsing stuff?
> > like displaying the option values on error or such?
> 
> The previous code was:
> -       if (strcmp(str, "list")) {
> This is handled explicitly in the code above this.
> 
> -               if (!perf_mem_events__parse(str)) {
> -                       mem->operation = 0;
> -                       return 0;
> -               }
> -               exit(-1);
> This is the code where the exit -1 happens, I inverted the comparison
> so that exit was more the exceptional code path. The behavior should
> be identical.

ok

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>

thanks,
jirka