[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202005111517.27E34BB6@keescook>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:24:10 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] exec: Move the call of prepare_binprm into
search_binary_handler
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:42:52PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> The code in prepare_binary_handler needs to be run every time
> search_binary_handler is called so move the call into search_binary_handler
> itself to make the code simpler and easier to understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Yes, nice. :) I don't see any ordering dependencies here. The only thing
I see is a potential for more "work done by kernel before bailing" in
the sense that the arg copying will be performed before we check the
kernel_read() result. I struggle to see how that might be a problem,
and this get us to fewer exec.c exports. Yay!
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists