linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] sparc: use snprintf() in show() methods

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <887e9dc1-745b-fd2d-39fe-3354e25c6ce8@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 09:24:21 +0800
From:   chenzhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] sparc: use snprintf() in show() methods

Sorry, i made a mistake, should be scnprintf().


On 2020/5/9 19:40, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-05-09 at 17:18 +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
>> snprintf() returns the number of bytes that would be written,
>> which may be greater than the the actual length to be written.
> []
>> Chen Zhou (2):
>>   sparc: use snprintf() in show_pciobppath_attr() in pci.c
>>   sparc: use snprintf() in show_pciobppath_attr() in vio.c
> Your subjects are a bit off: snprintf vs scnprintf
>
>
>
>