[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200511111855.48216940@xps13>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 11:18:55 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>
Cc: <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<boris.brezillon@...labora.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <marex@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: get resources from
parent node
Hi Christophe,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com> wrote on Wed, 6 May 2020
11:11:19 +0200:
> FMC2 EBI support has been added. Common resources (registers base
> and clock) are now shared between the 2 drivers. It means that the
> common resources should now be found in the parent device when EBI
> node is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>
> ---
[...]
> +
> +static bool stm32_fmc2_nfc_check_for_parent(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + u32 i;
> + int nb_resources = 0;
> +
> + /* Count the number of resources in reg property */
> + for (i = 0; i < pdev->num_resources; i++) {
> + struct resource *res = &pdev->resource[i];
> +
> + if (resource_type(res) == IORESOURCE_MEM)
> + nb_resources++;
> + }
> +
> + /* Each CS needs 3 resources defined (data, cmd and addr) */
> + if (nb_resources % 3)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
This function looks fragile. Why not just checking the compatible
string of the parent node?
> +
> static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1824,8 +1865,8 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *res;
> struct mtd_info *mtd;
> struct nand_chip *chip;
> - void __iomem *mmio;
> int chip_cs, mem_region, ret, irq;
> + int num_region = 1;
>
> nfc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nfc), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!nfc)
> @@ -1834,23 +1875,19 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> nfc->dev = dev;
> nand_controller_init(&nfc->base);
> nfc->base.ops = &stm32_fmc2_nfc_controller_ops;
> + nfc->has_parent = stm32_fmc2_nfc_check_for_parent(pdev);
> + if (nfc->has_parent)
> + num_region = 0;
>
> ret = stm32_fmc2_nfc_parse_dt(nfc);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> - mmio = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> - if (IS_ERR(mmio))
> - return PTR_ERR(mmio);
> -
> - nfc->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, mmio, &stm32_fmc2_regmap_cfg);
> - if (IS_ERR(nfc->regmap))
> - return PTR_ERR(nfc->regmap);
> -
> - nfc->io_phys_addr = res->start;
> + ret = stm32_fmc2_nfc_set_regmap_clk(pdev, nfc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Are you sure this driver sill works without the EBI block?
This change looks suspect.
>
> - for (chip_cs = 0, mem_region = 1; chip_cs < FMC2_MAX_CE;
> + for (chip_cs = 0, mem_region = num_region; chip_cs < FMC2_MAX_CE;
> chip_cs++, mem_region += 3) {
> if (!(nfc->cs_assigned & BIT(chip_cs)))
> continue;
> @@ -1888,10 +1925,6 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> init_completion(&nfc->complete);
>
> - nfc->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> - if (IS_ERR(nfc->clk))
> - return PTR_ERR(nfc->clk);
> -
Same here
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->clk);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "can not enable the clock\n");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists