[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1589201095-12884-1-git-send-email-mafeng.ma@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 20:44:55 +0800
From: Ma Feng <mafeng.ma@...wei.com>
To: <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: topology: make cpu_corepower_mask static
Fix sparse warning:
arch/arm/kernel/topology.c:184:22: warning: symbol 'cpu_corepower_mask'
was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ma Feng <mafeng.ma@...wei.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
index b5adaf7..563fdaa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static inline void update_cpu_capacity(unsigned int cpuid) {}
* The current assumption is that we can power gate each core independently.
* This will be superseded by DT binding once available.
*/
-const struct cpumask *cpu_corepower_mask(int cpu)
+static const struct cpumask *cpu_corepower_mask(int cpu)
{
return &cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling;
}
--
2.6.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists