| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 10:26:53 -0300
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel@...labora.com, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>,
Jeffrey Kardatzke <jkardatzke@...omium.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] media: rkvdec: Add the VP9 backend
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 18:56 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 6:26 PM Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 12:34 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On 05/05/2020 15:41, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
> > > >
> > > > The Rockchip VDEC supports VP9 profile 0 up to 4096x2304@...ps. Add
> > > > a backend for this new format.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/Makefile | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c | 1577 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.c | 56 +-
> > > > drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec.h | 6 +
> > > > 4 files changed, 1637 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100644 drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/Makefile b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/Makefile
> > > > index c08fed0a39f9..cb86b429cfaa 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/Makefile
> > > > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> > > > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ROCKCHIP_VDEC) += rockchip-vdec.o
> > > >
> > > > -rockchip-vdec-y += rkvdec.o rkvdec-h264.o
> > > > +rockchip-vdec-y += rkvdec.o rkvdec-h264.o rkvdec-vp9.o
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..37d0ea4e3570
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,1577 @@
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > +static void init_inter_probs(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx,
> > > > + const struct rkvdec_vp9_run *run)
> > > > +{
> > > > + const struct v4l2_ctrl_vp9_frame_decode_params *dec_params;
> > > > + struct rkvdec_vp9_ctx *vp9_ctx = ctx->priv;
> > > > + struct rkvdec_vp9_priv_tbl *tbl = vp9_ctx->priv_tbl.cpu;
> > > > + struct rkvdec_vp9_inter_frame_probs *rkprobs;
> > > > + const struct v4l2_vp9_probabilities *probs;
> > > > + unsigned int i, j, k;
> > > > +
> > > > + rkprobs = &tbl->probs.inter;
> > > > + dec_params = run->decode_params;
> > > > + probs = &dec_params->probs;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * inter probs
> > > > + * 151 x 128 bits, aligned to 152 x 128 bits
> > > > + * inter only
> > > > + * intra_y_mode & inter_block info 6 x 128 bits
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->y_mode, probs->y_mode, sizeof(rkprobs->y_mode));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->comp_mode, probs->comp_mode,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->comp_mode));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->comp_ref, probs->comp_ref,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->comp_ref));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->single_ref, probs->single_ref,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->single_ref));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->inter_mode, probs->inter_mode,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->inter_mode));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->interp_filter, probs->interp_filter,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->interp_filter));
> > > > +
> > > > + /* 128 x 128 bits coeff related */
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(probs->coef); i++) {
> > > > + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(probs->coef[0]); j++) {
> > > > + for (k = 0; k < ARRAY_SIZE(probs->coef[0][0]); k++)
> > > > + write_coeff_plane(probs->coef[i][j][k],
> > > > + rkprobs->coef[k][i][j]);
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* intra uv mode 6 x 128 */
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->uv_mode_0_2, &probs->uv_mode[0],
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->uv_mode_0_2));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->uv_mode_3_5, &probs->uv_mode[3],
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->uv_mode_3_5));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->uv_mode_6_8, &probs->uv_mode[6],
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->uv_mode_6_8));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->uv_mode_9, &probs->uv_mode[9],
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->uv_mode_9));
> > > > +
> > > > + /* mv related 6 x 128 */
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->mv.joint, probs->mv.joint,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->mv.joint));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->mv.sign, probs->mv.sign,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->mv.sign));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->mv.class, probs->mv.class,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->mv.class));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->mv.class0_bit, probs->mv.class0_bit,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->mv.class0_bit));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->mv.bits, probs->mv.bits,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->mv.bits));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->mv.class0_fr, probs->mv.class0_fr,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->mv.class0_fr));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->mv.fr, probs->mv.fr,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->mv.fr));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->mv.class0_hp, probs->mv.class0_hp,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->mv.class0_hp));
> > > > + memcpy(rkprobs->mv.hp, probs->mv.hp,
> > > > + sizeof(rkprobs->mv.hp));
> > >
> > > Can't you just do: 'rkprobs->mv = probs->mv'?
> > >
> >
> > I think I'd like to keep this as-is.
> >
> > Having the memcpy makes it explicit that we are copying
> > these structs around. While the assignment would
> > bring type checking, it can be misleading for readers.
>
> On the other hand, it's not obvious from the code that all fields of
> the structure are copied. Perhaps memcpy(&rkprobs->mv, &probs->mv,
> sizeof(rkprobs->mv)) would be a good compromise?
Well, that would effectively (inadvertedly) tie probs:mv to rkprobs:mv,
so we might as well do something like:
(thanks Boris for the suggestion)
--- a/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkvdec/rkvdec-vp9.c
@@ -48,17 +48,7 @@ struct rkvdec_vp9_inter_frame_probs {
u8 uv_mode_9[9];
u8 padding4[7];
u8 padding5[16];
- struct {
- u8 joint[3];
- u8 sign[2];
- u8 class[2][10];
- u8 class0_bit[2];
- u8 bits[2][10];
- u8 class0_fr[2][2][3];
- u8 fr[2][3];
- u8 class0_hp[2];
- u8 hp[2];
- } mv;
+ struct v4l2_vp9_mv_probabilities mv;
};
However, I'm reluctant to consider any of these suggestions
because we are effectively matching a hardware descriptor
to a software interface, where the latter is unstable.
If we were to change the software interface at any point,
we'd break this driver.
The more I think about this, the more I think the drivers
needs to stay as-is.
Thanks,
Ezequiel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists