lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 15:47:20 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@...to.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Wen Gong <wgong@...eaurora.org>,
        Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@...il.com>,
        ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ath10k: fix gcc-10 zero-length-bounds warnings

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 3:10 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
>
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:03 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org> writes:
> >
> >> >
> >> > This treewide patch no longer contains changes for ath10k. I removed them
> >> > since Monday (05/04/2020). So, this "Fixes" tag does not apply.
> >
> > Oops, I forgot to update the changelog trext when rebasing.
> >
> >> Ok, I'll remove it. Also I'll take these to my ath.git tree, not to
> >> net-next.
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
>
> Weird, I had a conflict with this patch but couldn't figure out why.
> Anyway, I fixed it in my pending branch and please double check:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=c3e5221f3c3ddabc76a33ff08440ff1dc664998d

Looks good to me. It may have been an artifact on my side, as I
have applied and later reverted Gustavo's patch on the same branch.

     Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ