linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: power: Convert bq27xxx dt to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 09:29:59 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
CC:     <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>,
        "Andrew F . Davis" <afd@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: power: Convert bq27xxx dt to yaml

Sebastian

On 5/11/20 9:32 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 07:25:06AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> On 5/10/20 11:17 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>>> This needs is missing the power-supplies property. The N900 DT
>>> contains a bq27200 referencing the charger, so it should fail the DT
>>> check without the property being listed here.
>> Hmm.  I ran the dt checker specifically on the binding and it did not fail.
>> Unless I need to build some other DTs as well.
>> Either I will have the power-supplies property
> I just tried it myself. The problem is the way you are specifying
> the compatible strings. This is the parsing result:
>
> enum: ['ti,bq27200 - BQ27200', 'ti,bq27210 - BQ27210', 'ti,bq27500 - deprecated,
>        use revision specific property below', ...
>
> You can see this in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.yaml, which
> is generated by running the check. The compatible comments need a # as separation
> character like this to generate proper bindings:
>
> properties:
>    compatible:
>      enum:
>        - ti,bq27200 # BQ27200
>        - ti,bq27210 # BQ27210
>        - ti,bq27500 # deprecated, use revision specific property below

Well honestly not sure why we need the comment either.   These are 
pretty self explanatory maybe we should just remove the additional comments

Any consideration on just removing the deprecated values?

Dan

>
> -- Sebastian