[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200511145959.GA20671@lsv03152.swis.in-blr01.nxp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 20:29:59 +0530
From: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux.cj@...il.com, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>,
"Rajesh V . Bikkina" <rajesh.bikkina@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Makarand Pawagi <makarand.pawagi@....com>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 4/5] net: phy: Introduce fwnode_get_phy_id()
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 03:04:57PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > NXP's LX2160ARDB platform currently has the following MDIO-PHY connection.
> >
> > MDIO-1 ==> one 40G PHY, two 1G PHYs(C45), two 10G PHYs(C22)
> > MDIO-2 ==> one 25G PHY
>
> It has been suggested that ACPI only support a one to one
> mapping. Each MAC has one MDIO bus, with one PHY on it. KISS.
>
> This clearly does not work for your hardware. So not only do we need
> to solve how PHY properties are described, we also need an equivalent
> of phy-handle, so a MAC can indicate which PHY it is connected to.
>
Right. I had introduced fwnode_get_phy_node() to take care of phy-handle.
> So in effect, you seem to be heading towards a pretty full
> reproduction of the DT binding. Before you go too much further and
> waste too much of your time, you might want confirmation from the ACPI
> people this is not too advanced for what ACPI can do and they tell you
> to forget ACPI for this hardware and stick with DT.
I've copied the patchset to Rafael and acpi ML.
Waiting for their response.
Thanks
Calvin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists