[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM4=RnKVBhfnHRnvZado_8h__J2eq4BaXEK7KwdPnOoMhzco5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 17:39:23 +0200
From: Radoslaw Biernacki <biernacki@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...gle.com>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: Use hard-coded crystal clock for Skylake mobile
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 2:34 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> Radoslaw Biernacki <biernacki@...gle.com> writes:
> > We found that regression only on specific SKU which was used in one
> > model of ChromeBook.
> > What's interesting is that some other SKU is fine.
> >
> > The consequences of this are rather not trivial,
> > so this was considered a quickfix and temporary till we develop
> > something better.
> > In contrast to ChromeOs, I know that there is no way of finding if
> > there are in fact regressions on generic kernel in the field (this is
> > SKU dependent),
> > but we also think that this problem should be addressed in a better
> > way (if possible).
>
> Fix the BIOS to setup the CPUID/MSRs correctly?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Yes of course, but "if possible" might mean we would not be able to
fix the BIOS.
Anyway, let me see what actually can be done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists