lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 10:10:07 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Cook <tony-cook@...pond.com>, zoran.davidovac@...il.com,
        euloanty@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix a warning in __kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init()

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:04:29AM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 9:05 AM Sean Christopherson
> <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > +cc a few other people that have reported this at one time or another.
> >
> > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 10:12:45AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 06:39:29PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:05:26PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > > GCC 10.0.1 gives me this warning when building KVM:
> > > > >
> > > > >   warning: ‘nr_pages_avail’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> > > > >   2442 |  for ( ; start_gfn <= end_gfn; start_gfn += nr_pages_avail) {
> > > > >
> > > > > It should not happen, but silent it.
> > > >
> > > > Heh, third times a charm?  This has been reported and proposed twice
> > > > before[1][2].  Are you using any custom compiler flags?  E.g. -O3 is known
> > > > to cause false positives with -Wmaybe-uninitialized.
> > >
> > > No, what I did was only upgrading to Fedora 32 (which will auto-upgrade GCC),
> > > so it should be using the default params of whatever provided.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > If we do end up killing this warning, I'd still prefer to use
> > > > uninitialized_var() over zero-initializing the variable.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200218184756.242904-1-oupton@google.com
> > > > [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207173
> > >
> > > OK, I didn't know this is a known problem and discussions going on.  But I
> > > guess it would be good to address this sooner because it could become a common
> > > warning very soon after people upgrades gcc.
> >
> > Ya, others are hitting this as well.  It's especially painful with the
> > existence of KVM_WERROR.
> >
> > Paolo, any preference on how to resolve this?  It would appear GCC 10 got
> > "smarter".
> 
> Seems that doing absolutely nothing was the fix here :) See:
> 
> 78a5255ffb6a ("Stop the ad-hoc games with -Wno-maybe-initialized")

Ah, perfect!  Thanks Oliver.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ