linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 17:44:50 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array

On Mon, 11 May 2020 12:46:47 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
> 
> struct foo {
>         int stuff;
>         struct boo array[];
> };
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.8

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
      commit: 936b9df7a5c00db92088b3c51316d5f551ee5b2c

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark