[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200512165124.GA24058@wind.enjellic.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 11:51:24 -0500
From: "Dr. Greg" <greg@...ellic.com>
To: "Hui, Chunyang" <sanqian.hcy@...fin.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, sean.j.christopherson@...el.com,
nhorman@...hat.com, npmccallum@...hat.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
kai.svahn@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, josh@...htriplett.org,
luto@...nel.org, kai.huang@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
cedric.xing@...el.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v29 00/20] Intel SGX foundations
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 07:55:58PM +0800, Hui, Chunyang wrote:
> > You can tell if your CPU supports SGX by looking into /proc/cpuinfo:
> >
> > cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep sgx
>
> Tested-by: Chunyang Hui <sanqian.hcy@...fin.com>
> Occlum project (https://github.com/occlum/occlum) is a libOS built
> on top of Intel SGX feature. We ran Occlum tests using patch v29 on
> SGX hardware with the Flexible Launch Control (FLC) feature and
> didn't find any problems. As Occlum core developers, we would like
> these patches to be merged soon.
Do you use the Intel PSW or your own?
Are you using the standard ECALL interface or did the tests run with
the new VDSO entry and exception handler?
Have a good day.
Dr. Greg
As always,
Dr. Greg Wettstein, Ph.D, Worker Autonomously self-defensive
Enjellic Systems Development, LLC IOT platforms and edge devices.
4206 N. 19th Ave.
Fargo, ND 58102
PH: 701-281-1686 EMAIL: greg@...ellic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I had far rather walk, as I do, in daily terror of eternity, than feel
that this was only a children's game in which all of the contestants
would get equally worthless prizes in the end."
-- T. S. Elliot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists