[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALMp9eRT69LWGE8dZVuLv2mxgc_R3W1SnPswHkhS8K0ZUX_B-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 09:58:19 -0700
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, changbin.du@...el.com,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com,
Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@...gle.com>,
anshuman.khandual@....com, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
steven.price@....com, rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterx@...hat.com,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com>, logang@...tatee.com,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, justin.he@....com,
robin.murphy@....com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
vineela.tummalapalli@...el.com, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
sam@...nborg.org, acme@...hat.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] KVM: x86: Move MPK feature detection to common code
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 8:12 AM Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/11/20 6:51 PM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:33 PM Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Both Intel and AMD support (MPK) Memory Protection Key feature.
> >> Move the feature detection from VMX to the common code. It should
> >> work for both the platforms now.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 4 +++-
> >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 ----
> >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> >> index 901cd1fdecd9..3da7d6ea7574 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> >> @@ -278,6 +278,8 @@ void kvm_set_cpu_caps(void)
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> >> unsigned int f_gbpages = F(GBPAGES);
> >> unsigned int f_lm = F(LM);
> >> + /* PKU is not yet implemented for shadow paging. */
> >> + unsigned int f_pku = tdp_enabled ? F(PKU) : 0;
> >
> > I think we still want to require that OSPKE be set on the host before
> > exposing PKU to the guest.
> >
>
> Ok I can add this check.
>
> + unsigned int f_pku = tdp_enabled && F(OSPKE)? F(PKU) : 0;
That doesn't do what you think it does. F(OSPKE) is a non-zero
constant, so that conjunct is always true.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists