linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 10:04:03 -0700
From:   "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, avri.altman@....com,
        alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     beanhuo@...ron.com, cang@...eaurora.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        bvanassche@....org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
        chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime
 suspend

Hi Stanley,

On 5/12/2020 3:47 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Currently UFS host driver promises VCC supply if UFS device
> needs to do WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend.
> 
> However the UFS specification mentions,
> 
> "While the flushing operation is in progress, the device is
> in Active power mode."
> 
> Therefore UFS host driver needs to promise more: Keep UFS
> device as "Active power mode", otherwise UFS device shall not
> do any flush if device enters Sleep or PowerDown power mode.
> 
> Fix this by not changing device power mode if WriteBooster
> flush is required in ufshcd_suspend().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h    |  1 -
>   drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> index b3135344ab3f..9e4bc2e97ada 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> @@ -577,7 +577,6 @@ struct ufs_dev_info {
>   	u32 d_ext_ufs_feature_sup;
>   	u8 b_wb_buffer_type;
>   	u32 d_wb_alloc_units;
> -	bool keep_vcc_on;
>   	u8 b_presrv_uspc_en;
>   };
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 169a3379e468..2d0aff8ac260 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -8101,8 +8101,7 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   	    !hba->dev_info.is_lu_power_on_wp) {
>   		ufshcd_setup_vreg(hba, false);
>   	} else if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) {
> -		if (!hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on)
> -			ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false);
> +		ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false);
>   		if (!ufshcd_is_link_active(hba)) {
>   			ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq);
>   			ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq2);
> @@ -8172,6 +8171,7 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>   	enum ufs_pm_level pm_lvl;
>   	enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode req_dev_pwr_mode;
>   	enum uic_link_state req_link_state;
> +	bool keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = false;
>   
>   	hba->pm_op_in_progress = 1;
>   	if (!ufshcd_is_shutdown_pm(pm_op)) {
> @@ -8226,28 +8226,27 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
>   			/* make sure that auto bkops is disabled */
>   			ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba);
>   		}
> +
>   		/*
> -		 * With wb enabled, if the bkops is enabled or if the
> -		 * configured WB type is 70% full, keep vcc ON
> -		 * for the device to flush the wb buffer
> +		 * If device needs to do BKOP or WB buffer flush, keep device
> +		 * power mode as "active power mode" and its VCC supply.
>   		 */
> -		if ((hba->auto_bkops_enabled && ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba)) ||
> -		    ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba))
> -			hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = true;
> -		else
> -			hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false;
> -	} else {
> -		hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false;
> +		keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = hba->auto_bkops_enabled ||
> +			ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba);
>   	}
>   
> -	if ((req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) &&
> -	    ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) ||
> -	    !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op))) {
> -		/* ensure that bkops is disabled */
> -		ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba);
> -		ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode);
> -		if (ret)
> -			goto enable_gating;
> +	if (req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) {
> +		if ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) ||
> +		    !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op)) {
> +			/* ensure that bkops is disabled */
> +			ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode) {
> +			ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode);
> +			if (ret)
> +				goto enable_gating;
> +		}
>   	}
>   
>   	flush_work(&hba->eeh_work);
> 

Can you please confirm that you've tested and found that with the 
previous code, the flush operation in the device was not happening.

If so, please can you let me know the test-case that you ran to figure 
this out.

I'd like to verify this at my end.

--
Thanks,
-asd

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project