[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA+D8ANK+Sd=nPeDZpd_=fQRFOdLtKgvsCmfQ_fRU3RCjMY+rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 10:48:41 +0800
From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: fsl_esai: Add support for imx8qm
Hi Mark, Nicolin
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:33 AM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 6:23 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 04:12:05PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > The difference for esai on imx8qm is that DMA device is EDMA.
> > >
> > > EDMA requires the period size to be multiple of maxburst. Otherwise
> > > the remaining bytes are not transferred and thus noise is produced.
> >
> > If this constraint comes from the DMA controller then normally you'd
> > expect the DMA controller integration to be enforcing this - is there no
> > information in the DMA API that lets us know that this constraint is
> > there?
>
> No, I can't find one API for this.
> Do you have a recommendation?
>
could you please recommend which DMA API can I use?
best regards
wang shengjiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists