[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d5f53eb-f642-3c8b-edf6-d4693ecb49a4@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 11:10:56 -0700
From: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
avri.altman@....com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, cang@...eaurora.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
bvanassche@....org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] scsi: ufs-mediatek: customize WriteBooster flush
policy
On 5/12/2020 9:21 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Hi Asutosh!
>
>> Patchset looks good to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
>
> When you want to approve an entire series, please respond to the cover
> letter email. Otherwise the kernel.org tooling will only record the tag
> for the individual patch you are responding to. In this case only patch
> 4 got tagged as reviewed in patchwork.
>
Hi Martin
Sure - I'll keep this in mind.
Thanks,
Asutosh
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists