linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] uapi, posix-timers: provide clockid-related macros and functions to UAPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y2pxvsbr.fsf@osv.gnss.ru>
Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 22:58:16 +0300
From:   Sergey Organov <sorganov@...il.com>
To:     Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] uapi, posix-timers: provide clockid-related macros
 and functions to UAPI

Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com> writes:

> As of now, there is no interface exposed for converting pid/fd into
> clockid and vice versa; linuxptp, for example, has been carrying these
> definitions in missing.h header for quite some time[1].
>
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/code/ci/af380e86/tree/missing.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1[1]:
>  * Actually tried to build with the patch and fixed the build error
>    reported by kbuild test robot[2].
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/20/698
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/22/13
> ---
>  include/linux/posix-timers.h | 47 +------------------------------------------
>  include/uapi/linux/time.h    | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

Was this patch applied, rejected, lost?

I can't find it in the current master.

Thanks,
-- Sergey Organov