[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158931520588.215346.14524550377627605126@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 13:26:45 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Harigovindan P <harigovi@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Harigovindan P <harigovi@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...il.com,
seanpaul@...omium.org, hoegsberg@...omium.org,
kalyan_t@...eaurora.org, nganji@...eaurora.org,
dianders@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [v1] drm/bridge: ensure bridge suspend happens during PM sleep
The subject is not specific enough. I'd expect it to be something like:
drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: ensure bridge suspend happens during PM sleep
Quoting Harigovindan P (2020-04-22 02:04:43)
> ti-sn65dsi86 bridge is enumerated as a runtime device.
>
> Adding sleep ops to force runtime_suspend when PM suspend is
> requested on the device.
>
> This change needs to be taken along with the series:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11494309/
Why? It doesn't seem like it should be required to go along with a qcom
specific driver patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harigovindan P <harigovi@...eaurora.org>
> ---
Besides the subject:
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists