[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200512085944.222637-10-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 10:59:36 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC 09/17] drm/amdgpu: use dma-fence annotations in cs_submit()
This is a bit tricky, since ->notifier_lock is held while calling
dma_fence_wait we must ensure that also the read side (i.e.
dma_fence_begin_signalling) is on the same side. If we mix this up
lockdep complaints, and that's again why we want to have these
annotations.
A nice side effect of this is that because of the fs_reclaim priming
for dma_fence_enable lockdep now automatically checks for us that
nothing in here allocates memory, without even running any userptr
workloads.
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
index 7653f62b1b2d..6db3f3c629b0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
@@ -1213,6 +1213,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
struct amdgpu_job *job;
uint64_t seq;
int r;
+ bool fence_cookie;
job = p->job;
p->job = NULL;
@@ -1227,6 +1228,8 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
*/
mutex_lock(&p->adev->notifier_lock);
+ fence_cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling();
+
/* If userptr are invalidated after amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(), return
* -EAGAIN, drmIoctl in libdrm will restart the amdgpu_cs_ioctl.
*/
@@ -1264,12 +1267,14 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail(p->adev, &fpriv->vm);
ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(&p->ticket, &p->validated, p->fence);
+ dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie);
mutex_unlock(&p->adev->notifier_lock);
return 0;
error_abort:
drm_sched_job_cleanup(&job->base);
+ dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie);
mutex_unlock(&p->adev->notifier_lock);
error_unlock:
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists