linux-kernel - Re: ARM: static kernel in vmalloc space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 16:17:58 +0530
From:   afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ARM: static kernel in vmalloc space

Hi,

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 05:29:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> What do you currently do with the module address space?

In the current setup, module address space was untouched, i.e. virtual
address difference b/n text & module space is far greater than 32MB, at
least > (2+768+16)MB and modules can't be loaded unless ARM_MODULE_PLTS
is enabled (this was checked now)

> easiest way is to just always put modules into vmalloc space, as we already
> do with CONFIG_ARM_MODULE_PLTS when the special area gets full,
> but that could be optimized once the rest works.

Okay

Regards
afzal