linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] irq/irq_sim: try to improve the API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 13:39:29 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] irq/irq_sim: try to improve the API

czw., 30 kwi 2020 o 16:30 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> napisał(a):
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> The interrupt simulator API exposes a lot of custom data structures and
> functions and doesn't reuse the interfaces already exposed by the irq
> subsystem. This series tries to address it.
>
> First, we make irq_domain_reset_irq_data() available to non-V2 domain API
> users - that'll be used in the subsequent patch. Next we overhaul the
> public interfaces - we hide all specific data structures and instead
> rely on the irq_domain struct and virtual interrupt numberspace.
>
> The end effect is that we limit the interrupt simulator API to three
> functions (plus one device managed variant) and zero new structures.
>

Hi Thomas, Marc,

I've been posting this for many weeks now without any major changes
and I dropped all controversial changes. Any chance of getting at
least this part in for v5.8?

Bartosz