lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 May 2020 16:34:47 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/urgent] perf tools: Fix is_bpf_image function logic

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:09:02AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:36:09PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:32:23AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:23:10PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > Adrian reported that is_bpf_image is not working the way it was
> > > > intended - passing on trampolines and dispatcher names. Instead
> > > > it returned true for all the bpf names.
> > > > 
> > > > The reason even this logic worked properly is that all bpf objects,
> > > > even trampolines and dispatcher, were assigned DSO_BINARY_TYPE__BPF_IMAGE
> > > > binary_type.
> > > > 
> > > > The later for bpf_prog objects, the binary_type was fixed in bpf load event
> > > > processing, which is executed after the ksymbol code.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixing the is_bpf_image logic, so it properly recognizes trampoline
> > > > and dispatcher objects.
> > > 
> > > This is not applying on top of torvalds/master, not tip/perf/urgent, and
> > 
> > right.. it's on top of your's perf/core.. I can rebase on perf/urgent
> 
> You don't need to, this hasn't hit torvalds/master, it'll be in the next
> merge window, the one for 5.8.
>  

perfect, thanks

jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ