[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200512155927.GA4297@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 21:29:27 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, tiwai@...e.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com, hui.wang@...onical.com,
broonie@...nel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
jank@...ence.com, mengdong.lin@...el.com,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
rander.wang@...ux.intel.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soundwire: bus_type: add sdw_master_device support
On 12-05-20, 09:36, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 5/11/20 10:30 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 11-05-20, 14:00, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > > > + md = &bus->md;
> > > > > + md->dev.bus = &sdw_bus_type;
> > > > > + md->dev.type = &sdw_master_type;
> > > > > + md->dev.parent = parent;
> > > > > + md->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
> > > > > + md->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
> > > > > + md->dev.dma_mask = parent->dma_mask;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + dev_set_name(&md->dev, "sdw-master-%d", bus->link_id);
> > > >
> > > > This give nice sdw-master-0. In DT this comes from reg property. I dont
> > > > seem to recall if the ACPI/Disco spec treats link_id as unique across
> > > > the system, can you check that please, if not we would need to update
> > > > this.
> > > Table 3 in the Disco for Soundwire 1.0 spec: "all LinkID values are relative
> > > to the immediate parent Device."
> > >
> > > There isn't any known implementation with more than one controller.
> >
> > But then it can come in "future" right. So lets try to make it future
> > proof by not using the link_id (we can expose that as a sysfs if people
> > want to know). So a global unique id needs to allocated (hint: idr or
> > equivalent) and used as master_id
>
> Can you clarify if you are asking for a global ID for Intel/ACPI platforms,
> or for DT as well? I can't figure out from the soundwire-controller.yaml
> definitions if there is already a notion of unique ID.
If ACPI was unique, then I was planning to update the definition below
to include that. Given that it is not the case, let's make it agnostic to
underlying firmware.
>
> properties:
> $nodename:
> pattern: "^soundwire(@.*)?$"
>
> soundwire@...0000 {
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> reg = <0x0c2d0000 0x2000>;
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists