[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200512021509.GF57962@builder.lan>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 19:15:09 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, nishakumari@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kgunda@...eaurora.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [v2 3/4] regulator: qcom: Add labibb driver
On Fri 08 May 13:41 PDT 2020, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> From: Nisha Kumari <nishakumari@...eaurora.org>
>
> Qualcomm platforms have LAB(LCD AMOLED Boost)/IBB(Inverting Buck Boost)
> Regulators, labibb for short, which are used as power supply for
lowercase Regulators
> LCD Mode displays.
>
> This patch adds labibb regulator driver for pmi8998 pmic, found on
Uppercase PMIC
> SDM845 platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nisha Kumari <nishakumari@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
>
> --
> v2: sumits: reworked the driver for more common code, and addressed
> review comments from v1. This includes merging regulator_ops into
> one, and allowing for future labibb variations.
> ---
> drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c | 288 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 299 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
> index f4b72cb098ef..58704a9fd05d 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/Kconfig
> @@ -1167,5 +1167,15 @@ config REGULATOR_WM8994
> This driver provides support for the voltage regulators on the
> WM8994 CODEC.
>
> +config REGULATOR_QCOM_LABIBB
> + tristate "QCOM LAB/IBB regulator support"
> + depends on SPMI || COMPILE_TEST
> + help
> + This driver supports Qualcomm's LAB/IBB regulators present on the
> + Qualcomm's PMIC chip pmi8998. QCOM LAB and IBB are SPMI
> + based PMIC implementations. LAB can be used as positive
> + boost regulator and IBB can be used as a negative boost regulator
> + for LCD display panel.
> +
> endif
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/Makefile b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
> index 6610ee001d9a..5b313786c0e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/Makefile
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6323) += mt6323-regulator.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6358) += mt6358-regulator.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6380) += mt6380-regulator.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_MT6397) += mt6397-regulator.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_LABIBB) += qcom-labibb-regulator.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_RPM) += qcom_rpm-regulator.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_RPMH) += qcom-rpmh-regulator.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_QCOM_SMD_RPM) += qcom_smd-regulator.o
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a9dc7c060375
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,288 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/of_regulator.h>
> +
> +#define REG_PERPH_TYPE 0x04
> +#define QCOM_LAB_TYPE 0x24
> +#define QCOM_IBB_TYPE 0x20
> +
> +#define REG_LABIBB_STATUS1 0x08
> +#define REG_LABIBB_ENABLE_CTL 0x46
> +#define LABIBB_STATUS1_VREG_OK_BIT BIT(7)
> +#define LABIBB_CONTROL_ENABLE BIT(7)
> +
> +#define LAB_ENABLE_CTL_MASK BIT(7)
> +#define IBB_ENABLE_CTL_MASK (BIT(7) | BIT(6))
> +
> +#define POWER_DELAY 8000
> +
> +struct labibb_regulator {
> + struct regulator_desc desc;
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> + u16 base;
> + u8 type;
> +};
> +
> +struct qcom_labibb {
You pretty much use this as a local variable within probe, and then you
use labibb_regulator in runtime. Perhaps you can just drop it?
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct labibb_regulator lab;
> + struct labibb_regulator ibb;
> +};
> +
> +struct labibb_regulator_data {
> + u16 base;
> + const char *name;
> + const char *irq_name;
> + u8 type;
> +};
> +
> +static int qcom_labibb_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u8 val;
> + struct labibb_regulator *reg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(reg->regmap, reg->base +
> + REG_LABIBB_STATUS1, &val, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(reg->dev, "Read register failed ret = %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (val & LABIBB_STATUS1_VREG_OK_BIT)
> + return 1;
> + else
> + return 0;
return !!(val & LABIBB_STATUS1_VREG_OK_BIT);
> +}
> +
> +static int _check_enabled_with_retries(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
> + int retries, int enabled)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct labibb_regulator *reg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> + while (retries--) {
Mark's suggestion of extending _regulator_enable_delay() to support
polling is_enable() seems reasonable.
The only complication I can see is that code path currently doesn't have
any expectations of the regulator not being operational at the end -
this seems to offer that possibility. So some care needs to be taken
there.
But doing that would allow you to use regulator_enable_regmap() as your
.enable function directly and you can drop
qcom_labibb_regulator_enable()
> + /* Wait for a small period before checking REG_LABIBB_STATUS1 */
> + usleep_range(POWER_DELAY, POWER_DELAY + 200);
> +
> + ret = qcom_labibb_regulator_is_enabled(rdev);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(reg->dev, "Can't read %s regulator status\n",
> + reg->desc.name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret == enabled)
> + return ret;
> +
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_labibb_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + int ret, retries = 10;
> + struct labibb_regulator *reg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable_regmap(rdev);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(reg->dev, "Write failed: enable %s regulator\n",
> + reg->desc.name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = _check_enabled_with_retries(rdev, retries, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(reg->dev, "retries exhausted: enable %s regulator\n",
> + reg->desc.name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return 0;
This looks weird; check for timeout, check for errors and then return
success.
> +
> +
> + dev_err(reg->dev, "Can't enable %s\n", reg->desc.name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_labibb_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> + int ret, retries = 2;
> + struct labibb_regulator *reg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> + ret = regulator_disable_regmap(rdev);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(reg->dev, "Write failed: disable %s regulator\n",
> + reg->desc.name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = _check_enabled_with_retries(rdev, retries, 0);
I don't think we care about waiting for the regulator to turning off,
might be nice to ensure that an off/on cycle really is allowed to take
its time though. So specifying an desc->off_on_delay of 8200 * 2 (the
worst case usleep_range() * retries) should take care of this.
And then you should be able to just use regulator_disable_regmap() as
your .disable function.
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(reg->dev, "retries exhausted: disable %s regulator\n",
> + reg->desc.name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ret)
> + return 0;
> +
> + dev_err(reg->dev, "Can't disable %s\n", reg->desc.name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct regulator_ops qcom_labibb_ops = {
> + .enable = qcom_labibb_regulator_enable,
> + .disable = qcom_labibb_regulator_disable,
> + .is_enabled = qcom_labibb_regulator_is_enabled,
> +};
> +
> +static int register_labibb_regulator(struct qcom_labibb *labibb,
> + const struct labibb_regulator_data *reg_data,
> + struct device_node *of_node)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct labibb_regulator *reg;
> + struct regulator_config cfg = {};
> +
> + if (reg_data->type == QCOM_LAB_TYPE) {
> + reg = &labibb->lab;
> + reg->desc.enable_mask = LAB_ENABLE_CTL_MASK;
> + } else {
> + reg = &labibb->ibb;
> + reg->desc.enable_mask = IBB_ENABLE_CTL_MASK;
> + }
> +
> + reg->dev = labibb->dev;
> + reg->base = reg_data->base;
> + reg->type = reg_data->type;
> + reg->regmap = labibb->regmap;
> + reg->desc.enable_reg = reg->base + REG_LABIBB_ENABLE_CTL;
> + reg->desc.enable_val = LABIBB_CONTROL_ENABLE;
> + reg->desc.of_match = reg_data->name;
> + reg->desc.name = reg_data->name;
> + reg->desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + reg->desc.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE;
> + reg->desc.ops = &qcom_labibb_ops;
> +
> + cfg.dev = labibb->dev;
> + cfg.driver_data = reg;
> + cfg.regmap = labibb->regmap;
> + cfg.of_node = of_node;
> +
> + reg->rdev = devm_regulator_register(labibb->dev, ®->desc,
> + &cfg);
Do you really need to wrap this line?
> + if (IS_ERR(reg->rdev)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(reg->rdev);
> + dev_err(labibb->dev,
> + "unable to register %s regulator\n", reg_data->name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + return 0;
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(reg->rdev);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct labibb_regulator_data pmi8998_labibb_data[] = {
> + {0xde00, "lab", "lab-sc-err", QCOM_LAB_TYPE},
Please shorten the interrupt to just "sc-err".
> + {0xdc00, "ibb", "ibb-sc-err", QCOM_IBB_TYPE},
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id qcom_labibb_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-lab-ibb", .data = &pmi8998_labibb_data},
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_labibb_match);
> +
> +static int qcom_labibb_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct qcom_labibb *labibb;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> + const struct labibb_regulator_data *reg;
> + u8 type;
> + int ret;
> +
> + labibb = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*labibb), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!labibb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + labibb->regmap = dev_get_regmap(pdev->dev.parent, NULL);
> + if (!labibb->regmap) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't get parent's regmap\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + labibb->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> + match = of_match_device(qcom_labibb_match, &pdev->dev);
> + if (!match)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + for (reg = match->data; reg->name; reg++) {
> + child = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, reg->name);
> +
> + /* TODO: This validates if the type of regulator is indeed
> + * what's mentioned in DT.
> + * I'm not sure if this is needed, but we'll keep it for now.
> + */
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(labibb->regmap,
> + reg->base + REG_PERPH_TYPE,
> + &type, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(labibb->dev,
> + "Peripheral type read failed ret=%d\n",
> + ret);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if ((type != QCOM_LAB_TYPE) && (type != QCOM_IBB_TYPE)) {
> + dev_err(labibb->dev,
> + "qcom_labibb: unknown peripheral type\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else if (type != reg->type) {
> + dev_err(labibb->dev,
> + "qcom_labibb: type read %x doesn't match DT %x\n",
> + type, reg->type);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = register_labibb_regulator(labibb, reg, child);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "qcom_labibb: error registering %s regulator: %d\n",
> + child->full_name, ret);
You already printed in register_labibb_regulator() so no need to print
again.
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, labibb);
rdev_get_drvdata() returns cfg.driver_data, so you don't need this one.
Regards,
Bjorn
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver qcom_labibb_regulator_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "qcom-lab-ibb-regulator",
> + .of_match_table = qcom_labibb_match,
> + },
> + .probe = qcom_labibb_regulator_probe,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(qcom_labibb_regulator_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm labibb driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists