[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYOV7oPbYE=9fXueYMacb5wv0r9T6F8tmECt-Eafe-fctw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 19:04:48 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kgdb: Fix broken handling of printk() in NMI context
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 19:55, Daniel Thompson
<daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:18:34PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Since commit 42a0bb3f7138 ("printk/nmi: generic solution for safe printk
> > in NMI"), kgdb entry in NMI context defaults to use safe NMI printk()
>
> I didn't see the author on Cc: nor any of the folks whose hands it
> passed through. It would definitely be good to involve them in this
> discussion.
>
Thanks for updating the Cc: list.
>
> > which involves CPU specific buffers and deferred printk() until exit from
> > NMI context.
> >
> > But kgdb being a stop-the-world debugger, we don't want to defer printk()
> > especially backtrace on corresponding CPUs. So instead switch to normal
> > printk() mode in kgdb_cpu_enter() if entry is in NMI context.
>
> So, firstly I should *definitely* take a mea cupla for not shouting
> about this at the time (I was on Cc:... twice). Only thing I can say
> confidently is that the test suite didn't yell about this and so I
> didn't look at this as closely as I should have done (and that it
> didn't yell is mostly because I'm still building out the test suite
> coverage).
>
> Anyhow...
>
> This feels a little like we are smearing the printk() interception logic
> across the kernel in ways that make things hard to read. If we accepted
> this patch we then have, the new NMI interception logic, the old kdb
> interception logic and some hacks in the kgdb trap handler to defang the
> NMI interception logic and force the kdb logic to kick in.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to migrate kdb interception logic up a couple of
> levels so that it continues to function even when we are in nmi printk
> mode. That way *all* the printk() interception code would end up in
> one place.
>
Yes it would be better to have all printk() interception code at one
place. Let me see if I can come up with an integrated logic.
> Finally some clue description of how to provoke the problem would be
> useful... that sort of things helps me to grow the test suite coverage.
>
Sure I will update the description. BTW, this issue can be easily
reproduced via issuing a backtrace (kdb command: "bt or btc") on a CPU
which entered kgdb in NMI context.
-Sumit
>
> Daniel.
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Similar change was posted earlier specific to arm64 here [1]. But after
> > discussions it emerged out that this broken handling of printk() in NMI
> > context should be a common problem that is relevant to other archs as well.
> > So fix this handling in kgdb_cpu_enter() as there can be multiple entry
> > points to kgdb in NMI context.
> >
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/24/328
> >
> > kernel/debug/debug_core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/debug/debug_core.c b/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
> > index 2b7c9b6..ab2933f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
> > @@ -567,6 +567,15 @@ static int kgdb_cpu_enter(struct kgdb_state *ks, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > kgdb_info[ks->cpu].enter_kgdb++;
> > kgdb_info[ks->cpu].exception_state |= exception_state;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * kgdb entry in NMI context defaults to use safe NMI printk() which
> > + * involves CPU specific buffers and deferred printk() until exit from
> > + * NMI context. But kgdb being a stop-the-world debugger, we don't want
> > + * to defer printk(). So instead switch to normal printk() mode here.
> > + */
> > + if (in_nmi())
> > + printk_nmi_exit();
> > +
> > if (exception_state == DCPU_WANT_MASTER)
> > atomic_inc(&masters_in_kgdb);
> > else
> > @@ -635,6 +644,8 @@ static int kgdb_cpu_enter(struct kgdb_state *ks, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > atomic_dec(&slaves_in_kgdb);
> > dbg_touch_watchdogs();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > + if (in_nmi())
> > + printk_nmi_enter();
> > return 0;
> > }
> > cpu_relax();
> > @@ -772,6 +783,8 @@ static int kgdb_cpu_enter(struct kgdb_state *ks, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > raw_spin_unlock(&dbg_master_lock);
> > dbg_touch_watchdogs();
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > + if (in_nmi())
> > + printk_nmi_enter();
> >
> > return kgdb_info[cpu].ret_state;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists