[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcA-oDboufsDNx1ZR4+HBwYt7LdLOpbfs7-bM9ByucKJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 17:55:50 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] spi: dw: Add support for polled operation via no
IRQ specified in DT
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 5:03 PM Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> With this change a SPI controller can be added without having a IRQ
> associated, and causing all transfers to be polled. For SPI controllers
> without DMA, this can significantly improve performance by less
> interrupt handling overhead.
...
> +#define VALID_IRQ(i) (i >= 0)
drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c:95:#define is_valid_irq(n) ((n) > 0)
Candidate to be in include/linux/irq.h ?
...
> + if (VALID_IRQ(dws->irq))
> + free_irq(dws->irq, master);
Isn't free_irq() aware of invalid ones (not found IRQ in the tree or
any other backend container won't do anything)?
> err_free_master:
> spi_controller_put(master);
> return ret;
> --
> 2.26.2
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists