linux-kernel - Re: file system permissions regression affecting root

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200513161113.GU23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 17:11:13 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Patrick Donnelly <batrick@...bytes.com>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: file system permissions regression affecting root

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:00:28AM -0700, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> In newer kernels (at least 5.6), it appears root is not able to write
> to files owned by other users in a sticky directory:

Yes.  Controlled by /proc/sys/fs/protected_regular, which systemd crowd
has decided to enable in commit 2732587540035227fe59e4b64b60127352611b35
Author: Lucas Werkmeister <mail@...aswerkmeister.de>
Date:   Wed Jan 16 00:16:10 2019 +0100

    Enable regular file and FIFO protection
    
    These sysctls were added in Linux 4.19 (torvalds/linux@...ba6656f), and
    we should enable them just like we enable the older hardlink/symlink
    protection since v199. Implements #11414.

in their tree.  The relevant part is this:
diff --git a/sysctl.d/50-default.conf b/sysctl.d/50-default.conf
index b0645f33e7..27084f6242 100644
--- a/sysctl.d/50-default.conf
+++ b/sysctl.d/50-default.conf
@@ -36,3 +36,7 @@ net.core.default_qdisc = fq_codel
 # Enable hard and soft link protection
 fs.protected_hardlinks = 1
 fs.protected_symlinks = 1
+
+# Enable regular file and FIFO protection
+fs.protected_regular = 1
+fs.protected_fifos = 1

so if you want the normal behaviour (and I certainly agree that the value
of that "protection" is not terribly high - I don't enable it on any of
my boxen and I don't use systemd, so they can't make those decisions for
me), I would suggest going into /etc/sysctl.d/ and telling the damn
thing _not_ to enable that.

>From the same commit:
+        * The fs.protected_regular and fs.protected_fifos sysctls, which were
+          added in Linux 4.19 to make some data spoofing attacks harder, are
+          now enabled by default. While this will hopefully improve the
+          security of most installations, it is technically a backwards
+          incompatible change; to disable these sysctls again, place the
+          following lines in /etc/sysctl.d/60-protected.conf or a similar file:
+
+              fs.protected_regular = 0
+              fs.protected_fifos = 0
+
+          Note that the similar hardlink and symlink protection has been
+          enabled since v199, and may be disabled likewise.