lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80039c21-41cf-2ace-939a-ef48fd773aa4@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 09:25:22 +0530
From:   Sivaprakash Murugesan <sivaprak@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     agross@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 8/8] arm64: dts: ipq6018: Add a53 pll and apcs clock

Hi Bjorn,

On 5/13/2020 1:54 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Sun 03 May 23:20 PDT 2020, Sivaprakash Murugesan wrote:
>
>> add support for apps pll and apcs clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sivaprakash Murugesan <sivaprak@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 16 +++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> index 1aa8d85..af2ceeb 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> @@ -294,12 +294,22 @@
>>   		};
>>   
>>   		apcs_glb: mailbox@...1000 {
>> -			compatible = "qcom,ipq8074-apcs-apps-global";
>> -			reg = <0x0b111000 0xc>;
>> -
>> +			compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-apcs-apps-global";
>> +			reg = <0x0b111000 0x1000>;
> My documentation states that IPQ8074 indeed has this block at
> 0x0b111000, but IPQ6018 it's at 0x6b111000. Can you confirm this is
> correct? Same with the pll below.
The address 0x6b111000 is how the RPM sees this block. For A53 it is 
still 0xb111000
>
> Apart from that the patch looks good.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ