[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87imgz1wvz.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 21:02:24 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/idt: Minor alloc_intr_gate() sanitization
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> writes:
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> writes:
>
>> This series is a successor of "[PATCH] x86/idt: Keep spurious entries unset
>> in system_vectors".
>>
>> The original issue I tried to address was that /proc/interrupts output
>> was always containing all possible system vectors, including non allocated
>> ones (e.g. 'Hypervisor callback interrupts' on bare metal). Thomas
>> suggested to expand this cosmetic change to making alloc_intr_gate()
>> __init.
>>
>> Vitaly Kuznetsov (3):
>> x86/xen: Split HVM vector callback setup and interrupt gate allocation
>> x86/idt: Annotate alloc_intr_gate() with __init
>> x86/idt: Keep spurious entries unset in system_vectors
>>
>
> Ping?
It's in my pile and I just did not come around to merge it.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists