linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: phy: tja11xx: add cable-test support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200513193056.GN499265@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 21:30:56 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: phy: tja11xx: add cable-test support

> > Do these registers all conform to the standard? Can we pull this code
> > out into a library which all standards conformant PHY drivers can use?
> 
> According to opensig, this functionality should be present on all new T1 PHYs.
> But the register/bit layout is no specified as standard. At least I was not able
> to find it. I assume, current layout is TJA11xx specific.

O.K. then:

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew