[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-0f72368a-209f-4659-a092-82e479b21a06@palmerdabbelt-glaptop1>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, hulkci@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] riscv: Make SYS_SUPPORTS_HUGETLBFS depends on MMU
On Sun, 10 May 2020 19:19:58 PDT (-0700), wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com wrote:
> HUGETLBFS only used when MMU enabled, add the dependence.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 494e670520ae..d0010ed8e0f4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> def_bool y
>
> config SYS_SUPPORTS_HUGETLBFS
> + depends on MMU
> def_bool y
I don't think this is the right way to do this: there's nothing specific to the
RISC-V implementation that makes HUGETLBFS depend on MMU. That said, SH
appears to do it this way so I'm OK taking this for now.
>
> config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
Powered by blists - more mailing lists